#GEEKBENCH MAC PRO 8 VS 10 CORE UPDATE#
#GEEKBENCH MAC PRO 8 VS 10 CORE FULL#

Regarding upcoming products I totally agree with you but, there is a but, in the past I owned a MacBook (I still have it actually, just using it as audio analyzer with flux:: (this is where the 2nd RJ45 port of the Mac Pro is very welcome)) and an iMac, but it don’t really fit my setup. What you mean by not reliable? they tend to physically fail or you mean not powerful enough? both? If anyone could give their thoughts to help me it would be very much appreciated :)

#GEEKBENCH MAC PRO 8 VS 10 CORE FULL#

As mac pro 2013 has been sold until late 2018, it should be supported at least until 2023, but sometimes Apple is full of surprise :( If the Mac Pro can hold until 2023 that would give me enough time to see what will come and why not a sort of mac mini pro or let’s say a more advanced one, with more TB/USB port and a M2 chip, why not (?). Usually Apple support its products 5 to 7 years after they stopped to make it.

#GEEKBENCH MAC PRO 8 VS 10 CORE UPDATE#

To be honest, even if the 2013 mac pro is compatible with Big Sur, I’m a bit scared because what if Apple claim next OS needs T2 chip in a year or so? Then T1 equipped macs won’t be able to get the last version of the OS and Logic as well :/ (just to be clear, I don’t need the last OS, I just need to be able to update Logic, but as you know Apple is linking its things).īeing future proof is indeed also important to me.

I don’t really mind waiting for 3rd party plugins, my main and most important tool is Logic. My choices are the mac mini M1 (with 16Gb RAM and 1Tb SSD) or a Mac Pro 2013 (I can have one for 1000 euros). In fact, my mac pro 2009 (2×2,26 nehelem) died. With Mac Pro, users can combine two Radeon Pro GPUs with 64GB each, or even add up to 1.5TB of RAM – components that have more impact than CPU performance for some tasks.Īccording to Apple, the company still has plans to introduce a new Mac Pro with Apple Silicon at some point, and this makes me wonder how powerful the chip created for this machine will be.MacBook Pro 14' 2021, M1 Pro 8-Core 32GB RAM The numbers are certainly surprising since Mac Studio is much more compact and efficient than Mac Pro, but that doesn’t mean that the M1 Ultra chip makes Mac Studio better than Mac Pro in every scenario. This means that M1 Ultra is about 20% faster than the most expensive CPU available for the Intel Mac Pro. The 28-core Intel Xeon W-3275M processor, which is the best you can get with Mac Pro, scores 19951 in Multi Core. But how does this compare to Intel’s high-end processors? However, when it comes to multi-core, the 20-core M1 Ultra scores 24055 in the Geekbench 5 test. Unsurprisingly, M1 Ultra scores 1747 in single-core, which is almost the same as other M1 variants (since the main difference between them is the number of cores). However, a leaked Geekbench result revealed that the M1 Ultra chip is more powerful than the 28-core Intel Xeon W, which is the highest-end processor available for Apple’s tower computer. On its website, Apple compares the new chip to the 16-core Intel Xeon W processor found in the Mac Pro. To give us a better idea of that performance, a Geekbench test shows that Apple’s latest chip beats the 28-core Intel Mac Pro. However, the company also offers a more expensive model with M1 Ultra, a new Apple Silicon chip that is even faster than the M1 Max. Apple on Tuesday introduced Mac Studio, which comes with the powerful M1 Max chip by default.

Geekbench mac pro 8 vs 10 core